{"id":1158,"date":"2009-02-03T13:24:28","date_gmt":"2009-02-03T18:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/?p=1158"},"modified":"2009-02-03T13:24:28","modified_gmt":"2009-02-03T18:24:28","slug":"linnovation-chez-google-ibm-et-autres-ideagoras","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/2009\/02\/linnovation-chez-google-ibm-et-autres-ideagoras\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;innovation chez Google, IBM et le Power V !"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Entre l&rsquo;\u00e9valuation de plates-formes intranet qui se veulent multilingues et Web 2.0 et sur lesquelles j&rsquo;\u00e9crirai dans un prochain billet, je continue \u00e0 naviguer sur le Web \u00e0 la recherche d&rsquo;informations pouvant m&rsquo;aider dans l&rsquo;\u00e9laboration de la programmation du prochain<a href=\"http:\/\/www.webcom-montreal.com\/\"> webcom-Montr\u00e9al.<\/a> En particulier tout ce qui a trait \u00e0 l&rsquo;innovation. J&rsquo;avoue, le sujet me passionne de plus en plus.<\/p>\n<p>Ce faisant, je suis tomb\u00e9 sur une int\u00e9ressante entrevue avec l&rsquo;\u00e9conomiste en chef de Google, <a href=\"http:\/\/people.ischool.berkeley.edu\/~hal\/\">Hal Varian<\/a>, qui est, entre autres, \u00abProfessor of information sciences, business, and economics at the University of California at Berkeley\u00bb. Et ce dernier n&rsquo;y va pas avec le dos de la cuiller quand il parle de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 pour les dirigeants d&rsquo;entreprise de changer leurs pratiques d&rsquo;affaires et leur fa\u00e7on de penser l&rsquo;innovation.<\/p>\n<p>Voici un passage de l&rsquo;entrevue :<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">\u00ab <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mckinseyquarterly.com\/Strategy\/Innovation\/Hal_Varian_on_how_the_Web_challenges_managers_2286\">We\u2019re in the middle of a period that I refer to as a period of \u201ccombinatorial innovation.\u201d So if you look historically, you\u2019ll find periods in history where there would be the availability of a different component parts that innovators could combine or recombine to create new inventions. In the 1800s, it was interchangeable parts. In 1920, it was electronics. In the 1970s, it was integrated circuits.<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mckinseyquarterly.com\/Strategy\/Innovation\/Hal_Varian_on_how_the_Web_challenges_managers_2286\">Now what we see is a period where you have Internet components, where you have software, protocols, languages, and capabilities to combine these component parts in ways that create totally new innovations. The great thing about the current period is that component parts are all bits. That means you never run out of them. You can reproduce them, you can duplicate them, you can spread them around the world, and you can have thousands and tens of thousands of innovators combining or recombining the same component parts to create new innovation. So there\u2019s no shortage. There are no inventory delays. It\u2019s a situation where the components are available for everyone, and so we get this tremendous burst of innovation that we\u2019re seeing.<\/a>\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Et encore, Varian est intarissable et j&rsquo;aurais pu le citer encore et encore mais il y a mieux. \u00c9coutez tout simplement son entrevue donn\u00e9e au McKinsey Quarterly en cliquant sur l&rsquo;image ci-dessous :<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.mckinseyquarterly.com\/wrapper.aspx?ar=2286&amp;story=true&amp;url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mckinseyquarterly.com%2fHal_Varian_on_how_the_Web_challenges_managers_2286%3fpagenum%3d1%23HalVarian&amp;pgn=hava09_exhibit\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/www.mckinseyquarterly.com\/files\/asset\/stillimage\/77.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"428\" height=\"256\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Mais je vous le dis tout de suite, quand il est question d&rsquo;innovation, j&rsquo;aime tout particuli\u00e8rement ce qui se fait de c\u00f4t\u00e9 des plates-formes de partage d&rsquo;id\u00e9es, les fameuses id\u00e9agoras. En cela, les plates-formes intranet que j&rsquo;\u00e9value actuellement en sont encore loin&#8230; Celles qui offrent cette opportunit\u00e9 ne sont pas tourn\u00e9es vers les employ\u00e9s \u00e0 l&rsquo;aide d&rsquo;une section particuli\u00e8re de l&rsquo;intranet mais plut\u00f4t vers les clients (Dell, Starbucks, Amazon, Proctor &amp; Gamble, etc.) ou vers les employ\u00e9s des autres et m\u00eame les retrait\u00e9s (YourEncore, NineSigma, TekScout, InnoCentive, etc.) toutes sauf&#8230; IBM..<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/farm4.static.flickr.com\/3123\/3250329175_3d555b7966.jpg?v=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"266\" height=\"185\" \/> <a href=\"http:\/\/www-03.ibm.com\/innovation\/ca\/en\/index.shtml\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/farm4.static.flickr.com\/3028\/3251148610_589ce62cc6.jpg?v=0\" alt=\"\" width=\"227\" height=\"185\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Toujours eux et c&rsquo;est compr\u00e9hensible quand on sait que Big Blue se veut un mod\u00e8le d&rsquo;entreprise 2.0 et prouve ainsi \u00e0 ses clients la pertinence de ses solutions d&rsquo;affaires. D&rsquo;autres soci\u00e9t\u00e9s travaillent \u00e9galement sur le principe des ideagoras et de l&rsquo;innovation \u00e0 l&rsquo;int\u00e9rieur de l&rsquo;entreprise. Le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.awakit-groupe.com\/index.php?category\/Labs\">Groupe fran\u00e7ais Awak&rsquo;It<\/a> est l&rsquo;exemple qui s&rsquo;en rapproche le plus&#8230; Il est grand temps que les entreprises comprennent que l&rsquo;innovation ne vient pas uniquement de la R&amp;D ou des clients. Le \u00ab<a href=\"http:\/\/fr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Crowdsourcing\">crowdsourcing<\/a>\u00bb s&rsquo;applique aussi aux partenaires d&rsquo;affaires et surtout aux employ\u00e9s, qu&rsquo;ils soient actifs ou retrait\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<p><object classid=\"clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000\" width=\"448\" height=\"394\" codebase=\"http:\/\/download.macromedia.com\/pub\/shockwave\/cabs\/flash\/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0\"><param name=\"id\" value=\"9200\" \/><param name=\"allowscriptaccess\" value=\"always\" \/><param name=\"src\" value=\"http:\/\/www.nbcchicago.com\/syndication?id=33949144&amp;path=%2Fnews%2Flocal\" \/><embed id=\"9200\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" width=\"448\" height=\"394\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nbcchicago.com\/syndication?id=33949144&amp;path=%2Fnews%2Flocal\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\"><\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n<p>De toutes ces plates-formes, celle qui sert le mieux l&rsquo;innovation est encore la doyenne <a href=\"http:\/\/www.innocentive.com\/\">InnoCentive<\/a>. J&rsquo;ai d\u00e9j\u00e0 publi\u00e9 une entrevue avec son pr\u00e9sident <a href=\"http:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/?p=1039\">Dwayne Spradlin<\/a>. Voici un reportage t\u00e9l\u00e9 qui fait corporatif, j&rsquo;en conviens, mais qui explique bien le principe que je viens de d\u00e9velopper. Vo us pourrez en savoir plus au prochain webcom-Montr\u00e9al car <a href=\"http:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/pub\/1\/361\/745\">Jon Fredrickson<\/a>, d&rsquo;Innocentive, pr\u00e9sentera \u00abOpen Innovation \u2013 the fuel for growth and change.\u00bb dans la piste Innovation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>MAJ<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Je viens tout juste de prendre connaissance d&rsquo;un billet paru sur<a href=\"http:\/\/minnov8.com\/2009\/01\/05\/why-executives-dont-get-social-media\/\"> Minnov8 <\/a>et intitul\u00e9 \u00abWhy Executives don&rsquo;t \u00ab\u00a0get\u00a0\u00bb Social Media\u00bb. Int\u00e9ressant car \u00e9crit justement par un dirigeant. Tous ces derniers sont de g\u00e9n\u00e9rations en comp\u00e9tition pour le \u00abpouvoir\u00bb et il explique bien ses motivations de \u00abPower V\u00bb avec le graphique suivant.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/minnov8.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/01\/motiveprofile.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"575\" height=\"467\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Pas besoin de vous dire qu&rsquo;avant que les Intranets 2.0, les id\u00e9agoras et l&rsquo;entreprise 2.0 d\u00e9colle vraiment dans les entreprises, va falloir un changement de leadership et\/ou un reconditionnement de ceux et celles qui vont s&rsquo;accrocher. On nomme cela : Gestion du changement et transformation organisationnelle. Penser collaboration plut\u00f4t que comp\u00e9tition. Passer de hi\u00e9rarchie verticale \u00e0 w\u00e9rarchie horizontale&#8230;. En passant, \u00abPower V\u00bb est employ\u00e9 dans<a href=\"http:\/\/www.themenschoice.com\/PowerV.html?cp=125&amp;KEYWORD=power%20v&amp;gclid=CLv0pZyGwZgCFQECGgodVAj_ZA\"> un autre context<\/a>e mais qui en dit long&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Entre l&rsquo;\u00e9valuation de plates-formes intranet qui se veulent multilingues et Web 2.0 et sur lesquelles j&rsquo;\u00e9crirai dans un prochain billet, je continue \u00e0 naviguer sur le Web \u00e0 la recherche d&rsquo;informations pouvant m&rsquo;aider dans l&rsquo;\u00e9laboration de la programmation du prochain webcom-Montr\u00e9al. En particulier tout ce qui a trait \u00e0 l&rsquo;innovation. J&rsquo;avoue, le sujet me passionne de plus en plus. Ce faisant, je suis tomb\u00e9 sur une int\u00e9ressante entrevue avec l&rsquo;\u00e9conomiste en chef de Google, Hal Varian, qui est, entre autres, \u00abProfessor of information sciences, business, and economics at the University of California at Berkeley\u00bb. Et ce dernier n&rsquo;y va pas avec le dos de la cuiller quand il parle de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 pour les dirigeants d&rsquo;entreprise de changer leurs pratiques d&rsquo;affaires et leur fa\u00e7on de penser l&rsquo;innovation. Voici un passage de l&rsquo;entrevue : \u00ab We\u2019re in the middle of a period that I refer to as a period of \u201ccombinatorial innovation.\u201d So if you look historically, you\u2019ll find periods in history where there would be the availability of a different component parts that innovators could combine or recombine to create new inventions. In the 1800s, it was interchangeable parts. In 1920, it was electronics. In the 1970s, it was integrated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,10,14,17],"tags":[168,435,839,847,882,884,926],"class_list":["post-1158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communication-interactive","category-entreprise-20","category-innovation","category-intranet","tag-awakit","tag-crowdsourcing","tag-ibm","tag-ideagoras","tag-inncentive","tag-innovation","tag-intranets"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1158"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1158\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}