{"id":1574,"date":"2009-04-14T11:29:08","date_gmt":"2009-04-14T16:29:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/?p=1574"},"modified":"2009-04-14T11:29:08","modified_gmt":"2009-04-14T16:29:08","slug":"palmares-de-linnovation-apple-et-google-au-sommet-du-top-10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/emergenceweb.com\/blog\/2009\/04\/palmares-de-linnovation-apple-et-google-au-sommet-du-top-10\/","title":{"rendered":"Palmar\u00e8s de l’innovation : Apple et Google au sommet du Top 10 !"},"content":{"rendered":"

Je tiens \u00e0 souligner aujourd’hui, la publication r\u00e9cente de la liste des 50 compagnies les plus innovantes, selon le magazine am\u00e9ricain BusinessWeek. Dans son \u00e9dition du 9 avril, voici comment on pr\u00e9sente les membres de ce club tr\u00e8s s\u00e9lect :<\/p>\n

\u00abNot so long ago, innovation was a must-do priority for business. Now research and development might seem more like vacation homes and new cars\u2014luxuries that will have to wait for better times. In an annual survey of top executives by Boston Consulting Group, which provides the foundation of BusinessWeek’s Most Innovative Companies list, more respondents said that innovation spending will be flat or down than since the ranking began in 2005. But recession and market meltdown aside, many on the 2009 ranking are finding ways to forge ahead.<\/a>\u00bb<\/p>\n

Ce qui veut dire qu’en temps de crise on a tendance \u00e0 couper dans les budgets de recherche et d\u00e9veloppement, bref dans la possibilit\u00e9 de la compagnie d’innover. Erreur… C’est l’innovation qui devrait aider les entreprises \u00e0 sortir de la crise, un th\u00e8me qui sera abord\u00e9 au prochain webcom-Montr\u00e9al<\/a> dans un mois car les nouvelles technologies et le Web ont leur mot \u00e0 dire. L’exemple le plus frappant c’est que neuf des onze premiers rangs du classement de BW sont occup\u00e9s par des entreprises technologiques.<\/p>\n

next slide<\/a> previous slide<\/a><\/p>\n
\"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a> \"\"<\/a><\/div>\n
Source ; BusinessWeek<\/div>\n
Voici les 11 premi\u00e8res:<\/div>\n
    \n
  1. Apple<\/strong><\/li>\n
  2. Google<\/strong><\/li>\n
  3. Toyota<\/li>\n
  4. Microsoft<\/strong><\/li>\n
  5. Nintendo<\/strong><\/li>\n
  6. IBM<\/strong><\/li>\n
  7. Hewlett-Packard<\/strong><\/li>\n
  8. Research in Motion<\/strong><\/li>\n
  9. Nokia<\/strong><\/li>\n
  10. Wall-Mart<\/li>\n
  11. Amazon<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Et je pourrais ajouter que l’entreprise qui vient en 12e place, soit Proctor & Gamble<\/a>, a \u00e9t\u00e9 l’une des premi\u00e8res \u00e0 \u00abinnover dans son innovation\u00bb en ayant recours aux id\u00e9agoras et au crowdsourcing, cas-type qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 utilis\u00e9 par Don Tapscott <\/strong>dans son bouquin Wikinomics<\/a>. P&G avait alors eu recours aux services du site InnoCentive<\/a>. elle a tellement aim\u00e9 les r\u00e9sultats qu’elle a cr\u00e9\u00e9 son propre site d’innovation appel\u00e9 P&G Connect et bas\u00e9 sur le crowdsourcing. (ci-dessous)<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/a><\/div>\n

    En passant, si vous voulez en savoir plus, Jon Frederickson, d’Innocentive<\/a> sera conf\u00e9rencier \u00e0 webcom-Montr\u00e9al le 13 mai prochain.<\/div>\n